畜牧人

標題: 胎衣不下的主要原因 [打印本頁]

作者: jt飼料    時間: 2009-10-3 08:02
標題: 胎衣不下的主要原因
胎衣不下都是由什么引起的,最主要的有是哪方面!
作者: 矮子    時間: 2009-10-3 08:46
1 子宮收縮無力.不能排出胎衣
奶牛運動不足、飼料單一、營養(yǎng)不良、體況過肥或過瘦等因素導(dǎo)致奶牛分娩無力;胎兒過大、懷雙胎、胎水過多等因素造成子宮肌肉過度擴張,胎兒產(chǎn)出后子宮弛緩:難產(chǎn)和助產(chǎn)使分娩期延長.子宮弛緩。
2 胎盤炎癥
母仔胎盤粘連.不能排出胎衣.如患有慢性子宮內(nèi)膜炎的牛等。
3 母仔胎盤之間聯(lián)系緊密
子宮收縮時不能直接將胎兒胎盤上的絨毛從子宮黏膜腺窩中擠出.而是先使扣狀胎盤互相靠攏.再收縮才能擠出胎兒胎盤上的絨毛.從而造成胎衣脫離較慢.易發(fā)生胎衣不下。



所有的資料內(nèi)容大同小異。






作者: 愛養(yǎng)豬的人    時間: 2009-10-3 10:03
支持樓上:haoa:。。。。。
作者: chenzhengy    時間: 2009-10-3 10:32
我們場子胎衣不下發(fā)病率達40%,算高不?
作者: linlejun    時間: 2009-12-22 15:19
不高不高,世界第三。兄弟要注意呀!
作者: linlin    時間: 2009-12-22 15:40
奧,反芻動物的發(fā)病率較高,注意合理的營養(yǎng)水平
作者: htz    時間: 2009-12-22 18:34
我來發(fā)一篇胎衣不下主題的文章吧?。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。?!在反芻版塊
作者: sun8318    時間: 2010-5-7 13:53
硒元素補充不足也可引起胎衣不下
作者: 王號    時間: 2010-5-7 19:33
牛場胎衣不下達到40%?挺嚴重的!應(yīng)該注意干奶期和圍產(chǎn)期管理了.....
作者: 260174134    時間: 2010-5-8 14:06
主要是體能、營養(yǎng)
作者: wuling005    時間: 2010-5-8 18:54
營養(yǎng)代謝是主要原因
作者: zqf823    時間: 2010-5-8 19:02
主要是體能、營養(yǎng)
作者: 花花好    時間: 2010-5-9 09:46
本帖最后由 花花好 于 2010-5-10 08:37 編輯

從疾病是將樓上的說的還行.我補充以下.產(chǎn)前的21天很關(guān)鍵,飼料要不然做低鈣,要不然添加陰離子.不允許給牛吃苜蓿,鹽和小蘇打減半.長期使用添加尿素的飼料也有這個癥狀,長期使用維生素添加不足的飼料還會有這個癥狀.不同意我的觀點的可以聊聊.沒養(yǎng)過牛的免談.
作者: jt飼料    時間: 2010-5-9 19:45
回復(fù) 13# 花花好


我聽老師說過
作者: niewanwan    時間: 2010-5-9 20:04
學(xué)習(xí)了?。。?!
作者: soslxlsos    時間: 2010-5-9 20:15
一般都是收縮無力比較多
作者: 花花好    時間: 2010-5-10 08:38
就是陰離子鹽.
作者: pameya    時間: 2010-5-11 22:30
可以適當喂點鮮的禾草,補充些VC
作者: 382948097    時間: 2010-5-28 12:06
你在圍產(chǎn)前期用一下陰離子鹽看看,我這使用陰離子鹽前胎衣不下約6%,使用后降到了2%.
作者: htz    時間: 2010-5-29 15:20
Retained Fetal Membranes
Etiology
RFM or retained placenta is a very common condition in
dairy cattle. Fetal membranes should be expelled in less
than 8 hours following normal parturition; therefore
retention for longer than 8 to 12 hours is considered
abnormal. Abortion, either infectious or sporadic, occurring
during the last half, of pregnancy frequently results
in RFM. Hydrops, uterine torsion, twinning, and dystocia
in general result in increased incidence of RFM when
compared with normal parturitions. Heat stress and periparturient
hypocalcemia also predispose to the condition.
Cows induced to calve by pharmacologic means
such as exogenous corticosteroid administration should
be anticipated to have RFM. Nutritional causes such
as overconditioning of dry cows and carotene and selenium
defi ciencies also have been incriminated. Low
le vels of vitamin A as occur in hyperkeratosis and polybrominated
biphenyls toxicity are associated with RFM,
metritis, and abortion. In selenium-defi cient areas, cattle
that have low selenium values may have an increased
incidence of RFM, metritis, and cystic ovaries. Vitamin E,
which has been shown to enhance neutrophil function,
also may be involved. Cattle fed stored feeds from areas
that are selenium defi cient should be monitored for selenium
status and supplemented routinely. Selenium
and vitamin E could be related to RFM either as a result
of pure defi ciency or altered neutrophil function.
Cattle that have RFM following parturition may be at
greater risk of the condition in subsequent years. Perhaps
more importantly, epidemiologic studies show that cows
with RFM have a higher incidence of metabolic diseases,
mastitis, metritis, and subsequent abortion. Therefore
despite the fact that many cows with RFM remain asymptomatic
as regards immediate uterine health, associated
diseases are a defi nite risk. Decreased resistance to uterine
and other infections in cattle with RFM is partially explained
by proven neutrophil dysfunction associated
with the condition in periparturient cows. In addition to
reduced neutrophil function, cattle with acute metritis
associated with RFM could have a depletion of neutrophils
in the peripheral blood as a result of acute recruitment
of neutrophils to the infected uterus as evidenced
by the degenerative left shift in the leukogram observed
in some septic metritis patients. Although septic metritis
or chronic endometritis does not occur in most cattle
with RFM, the urge to treat RFM is based primarily on the
inability to predict which cows will develop clinically
signifi cant sequelae.
Recent evidence strengthens the hypothesis that RFM is
mediated by impaired neutrophil function beginning in
the late dry period. Reduced neutrophil migration toward
tissue extracts of placentomes can be detected as long
as 2 weeks before calving in cows that go on to develop
RFM. Other neutrophil functions, such as oxidative burst
作者: htz    時間: 2010-5-29 15:21
(a component of neutrophil bacterial killing action) are
also impaired in these cows. Impaired neutrophil function
has also been recorded in hypocalcemic cows. Indeed,
many of the etiological factors associated with RFM
have also been correlated to impairment of neutrophil
function, including vitamin and mineral defi ciencies, heat
stress, or exogenous corticosteroid administration. The
poor neutrophil function in affected cows extends into
the postpartum period and probably mediates most of
the complications usually associated with RFM.
Clinical Signs and Diagnosis
Clinical signs are obvious when the fetal membranes
protrude from the vulva or hang ventral from the vulva
to the escutcheon, rear udder, or hocks (Figure 9-6). The
condition is less apparent when the membranes are retained
within the uterus or only project into the cervix or
vagina and require a vaginal examination to be detected.
Other clinical signs are completely dependent on evolution
of associated diseases. Metritis is the most common
secondary complication, and clinical signs of metritis
or endometritis are identical to those discussed in the
metritis section. Secondary metabolic conditions may
be linked directly to RFM when metritis exists or
merely concurrent when the metritis is insignifi cant. As
作者: htz    時間: 2010-5-29 15:21
previously mentioned, mastitis, metabolic diseases, ascending
urinary tract infections, and displaced abomasum
may be associated with RFM complicated by metritis
or, in the case of infections, because of less than optimal
neutrophil function.
Tenesmus may appear in some cattle because of constant
tension and irritation of the caudal reproductive
tract by the protruding membranes. Eventually a fetid
odor emanates from the RFM, especially when metritis
develops, and this may be the initial prompt for producers
to seek veterinary attention or instigate treatment
themselves.
Untreated, most RFMs separate and fall away 3 to
12 days following calving. Unfortunately some cattle
with RFM completely confi ned to the uterus may retain
the membranes for a longer time because of cervical closure
or antibiotic treatments, and only pass the RFM after
the fi rst estrus. These cows may become quite ill because
of secondary metritis and retention of fetid fl uid but go
undetected initially because of a minimum of discharge
and odor.
Clinical debate is sparked when the signifi cance of RFM
in dairy cattle is discussed. Because only a small percentage
of cattle with RFM become ill and because numerous studies
show that the subsequent fertility of cattle allowed to
discharge RFM spontaneously is largely unaffected, why
should veterinarians ever consider treating a cow with
RFM? A frequently quoted reference from 1932 that details
the subsequent fertility of 44 cows with untreated RFM
compared with 44 herdmates without RFM showed no
difference in subsequent fertility. Many other studies have
since proven that manual removal of RFM is not only unnecessary
but may be harmful. Although accepting these
data as regards the simple issue of RFM, the studies tend to
ignore the effects of the condition on the overall wellbeing
of the cows with RFM. For example, in Palmer’s 1932
article, only 31.8% of cattle with RFM had normal appetites
for the 7 weeks following calving and only 29.5% had
“good” milk production. It seems that these data support
the observations of owners of cattle with RFM who believe
that complete therapeutic disregard for cattle with RFM
can lead to disaster. This is particularly true for obese cows
with RFM. Reduced appetites leading to metabolic diseases
or abomasal displacement are a defi nite problem in many
cows with RFM that develop moderate or severe metritis.
Even though the primary problem of RFM can clearly resolve
itself naturally given time, the potential for associated
and secondary problems exists, and “doing nothing”
is often perceived as a potential economic gamble by owners
of the modern high-producing dairy cow.
Treatment
A fascinating historical summation of treatment for RFM
in cattle involving thousands of patients treated over
several decades by the Ambulatory Clinic of the New
York State Veterinary College is detailed in Roberts’ text.
作者: htz    時間: 2010-5-29 15:21
A summary of these data would suggest that less invasive,
less manipulative treatments in association with
intrauterine or systemic antibiotics (as indicated by the
individual patient’s need and degree of metritis) progressively
lessened the mortality rate for cattle with RFM.
Cattle that resolve RFM and cycle normally should have
fertility rates comparable with unaffected herdmates
when breeding is begun at 90 days but may require adjunctive
therapy in herds that begin breeding at 50 to
60 days as is common today.
Decisions to treat RFM may be based on medical need
when metritis or other illnesses coexist or for the purpose
of prophylaxis against metritis and associated problems.
Some practitioners and owners take a “wait and see” attitude
to avoid antibiotic concerns or unnecessary treatment
whenever possible. Others who have herds that
historically have a high incidence of metritis, ketosis, or
abomasal displacement secondary to RFM tend to intervene
prophylactically and therapeutically. Cattle that had
dystocia, twinning, induced parturition, obesity, hepatic
lipidosis, and RFM should be considered at high risk for
metritis and probably justify prophylactic therapy. It is
likely that the greatest benefi ts will accrue when measures
are taken to improve management of cows in late gestation,
rather than focus attention on cows actually suffering
from RFM.
Treatment options include:
1. Do nothing—this course of action can be used
when the affected cow appears completely healthy
otherwise. Routine prebreeding reproductive
exams can dictate the need for hormonal or
antibiotic therapy following discharge of the
membranes.
2. Administer systemic antibiotics prophylactically—
usually ceftiofur (2.2 mg/kg once daily) is chosen to
lessen milk withholding concerns. Treatment is
started as soon as the RFM are judged pathologic
(12 or 24 hours) and continued daily for 3 to 7 days
or until the membranes separate. Systemic antibiotics
immediately postpartum have a lesser economic
impact because milk often is discarded during this
time and penicillin could be used, but continued or
long-term therapy can have signifi cant economic
impact because of drug costs and lost milk. Cows
with high risk for metritis, e.g., overweight cows with
RFM and suspected hepatic lipidosis, should be
treated prophylactically with antibiotics and oxytocin
in the immediate postpartum period. Although
oxytocin does not promote release of membranes
(indeed, cows with RFM have increased uterine tone
relative to unaffected herd mates), evacuation of the
uterus is a desirable consequence of treatment.
3. Administer intrauterine antibiotics
prophylactically—usually tetracycline, ceftiofur, or
penicillin is administered once daily or once every
other day until the placenta falls away. In each case
作者: htz    時間: 2010-5-29 15:22
this represents extra-label drug use and the treatment
has not been found to improve subsequent
fertility. Tetracyclines may delay release of the placenta
by inhibiting local metalloproteinases that
play an important role in placental release. Catheter
infusion of recently postpartum (1 week) cattle is
contraindicated—especially when performed by
laypeople—because perforation of the cranial vagina
or uterine body is an all-too-common sequela
when the reproductive tract is too heavy to retract.
4. Combination of techniques 2 and 3.
5. Manual removal of RFM—this technique is no longer
favored. More harm than good may come from
manual attempts to remove RFM that are still fi rmly
adhered to maternal caruncles, and further injury or
irritation to the uterine endometrium can occur in
badly infected or traumatized uteri. If the placenta
is not easily removed with minimal tension, any
further attempt to remove it manually should be
abandoned. Some owners still request removal
of RFM, and veterinarians must be emphatic that
the procedure is not wise in most instances, lest
the removal cause more subsequent damage than
the existing condition.
6. Treatment of RFM complicated by metritis—see the
section discussing metritis because all therapeutic
decisions are based on resolution of that disease.
7. Hormonal treatment of retained placenta—oxytocin,
prostaglandins, and estrogens have been proposed
in varying dosages and times of administration to
prevent or cause more rapid expulsion of RFM.
There is little, if any, evidence that these treatments
have any effect. In our hospital, oxytocin (5 U IM
every 2 to 4 hours) is given for metritis and/or RFM
5 days duration in an attempt to decrease the volume
of septic fl uid in the uterus.
8. RFM protruding outside the vulva should be placed
in a clean plastic bag (rectal sleeve) so gross contamination
of the udder does not occur from the
RFM. Although many practitioners prefer not to
trim the protruding membranes in the belief that
the weight of the dependent membranes speeds detachment,
there is little supporting evidence for this
view. Indeed, fetal membranes left intact at cesarean
surgery are usually expelled spontaneously within a
few days.
作者: cgz880112    時間: 2010-6-7 08:41
補充小蘇打可以嗎
作者: as1985323123    時間: 2010-6-7 09:36
如同各位所說的  大多數(shù)都是這樣的  大同小異
作者: 王作鵬    時間: 2010-7-9 10:36
胎衣不下這莫多,是流產(chǎn)牛多吧?
作者: wangjq888    時間: 2010-7-9 14:24
胎衣不下,也跟激素水平有關(guān)的,產(chǎn)前三個月要注射三次維生素AD、E隔一個月注射一次!不過這只是廣東地區(qū)奶牛場的方法了,不知其他地方怎么樣
作者: lyaodong    時間: 2010-7-9 17:33
不排除微量元素維生素的缺乏,產(chǎn)前VE+硒組合可以降低胎衣不義的發(fā)生幾率。
作者: 159656421131    時間: 2010-8-16 20:45
胎衣不下,大同小異
作者: k-fish    時間: 2010-8-17 21:04
缺鈣和蛋白質(zhì)水平過高也是原因吧 在圍產(chǎn)前期飼喂苜蓿胎衣不下率明顯高于不飼喂
作者: 沈陽禾豐反芻    時間: 2010-8-17 22:06
低血鈣   子宮炎  運動量不足  流產(chǎn) 早產(chǎn) 碳水化合物采食量不足 酮病 維生素E 缺乏 產(chǎn)前高鈣日糧 都可造成 胎衣停滯
作者: Karl    時間: 2010-9-2 19:50
礦物質(zhì)缺乏, 運動不足, 粗暴助產(chǎn), 產(chǎn)后應(yīng)激(大多是對奶牛施暴)
作者: ailin99    時間: 2010-9-3 13:31
熱應(yīng)激和圍產(chǎn)期低血鈣很容易造成胎衣不下
作者: as1985323123    時間: 2010-10-2 10:30
原因比較多。一般是飼料,應(yīng)激,體質(zhì)差的,過于肥的。
作者: langhun74    時間: 2010-10-12 10:53
回復(fù) 33# Karl [/b
對奶牛施暴.........................
作者: asiazhang1980    時間: 2010-10-12 12:54
回復(fù) 25# cgz880112


    不可以。
作者: zycwfj    時間: 2010-10-12 13:13
大多是營養(yǎng)和管理問題
作者: 牛寶寶    時間: 2010-10-22 21:25
妊娠牛增加適當?shù)倪\動和光照, 注意鈣磷和維生素的補充可以很好的預(yù)防胎衣不下。
作者: 山中的漫游者    時間: 2010-10-22 23:05
基本的直接原因,是子宮收縮無力造成的




歡迎光臨 畜牧人 (http://ffers.com.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X3.5